Originally Posted by
Digital_Cowboy
In the same or a similar situation I’d be more likely than not to just go around the group going into the grass if needed. But the point is that neither I nor the OP should have to do that.
And there's the sense of entitlement.
Originally Posted by
Digital_Cowboy
Yes, but that doesn’t give them the right to block the trail and prevent others from going about their business.
So, when
you blocked someone's path, were you looking for a fight? Or was it an innocent mistake?
Originally Posted by
Digital_Cowboy
I have to disagree with you, otherwise why where they blocking the trail in more than one place?
If they were looking for a fight, it stands to reason that they would maximize their chance of success by sticking together and surrounding the OP ant his companions. Splitting into multiple groups actually makes looking for a fight to be an even less likely explanation than it otherwise was. The biggest indication that they weren't looking for a fight, however, is the fact that there wasn't a fight. If they were looking for a fight, it would have happened.