Old 11-07-14, 07:01 AM
  #31  
tcs
Palmer
 
tcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,627

Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1671 Post(s)
Liked 1,827 Times in 1,063 Posts
Originally Posted by Gresp15C
There are two problems with achieving this goal for bike lighting. First, the amount of control you have over the light beam depends on the overall size of the optics, and we don't want something that's huge.
We might not want it, but we'd be better off with something bigger than what we have been getting lately.

LEDs + least weight wins = ever shrinking cycle lights. Tiny, point source-esque lights increase dazzle, decrease visibility and provide far less distance information to observers (i.e., at 200 meters a point source light looks like a point source - and still looks like a point source at 100 meters.)

This is sort of a 'lost knowledge' thing. Here's what's happened to cycle light size in a generation:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
schmidt e6-edelux.jpg (62.8 KB, 31 views)
tcs is offline