Old 11-07-14, 10:25 AM
  #37  
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times in 1,213 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
I don't see how you can properly aim a light so intense. It sounds nearly impossible. I also don't see how such a bright light is more useful than something that is moderately bright. I started a thread about this a few weeks ago. Basically, the American attitude is more is better, even more is even better, and even more than that is even better. But life isn't like that. There are points of diminishing returns. Adding more light is not only not useful, it is detrimental. When you learned that 60 psi in your tires was better than 20 psi, did you decide to inflate your tires to 250 psi? I'm guessing not.

It is highly inconsiderate and dangerous to shine thousands of lumens into a person's eyes. No wonder the person cursed you out. You earned it.

The argument of "Hey, it prevented me from being hit, so it's clearly a good thing" is a very poor argument. You could also punch people in their faces and argue the same thing. You have gone way past the point of diminishing returns. Your safety should not come at the cost of everyone else's comfort and convenience. As the anti-smoking activist said, your right to swing your fist stops at my nose.
+2

I was going to suggest that the OP, since he's bought the monstrosity, might consider aiming it so that the brightest part of the beam hits the ground about 10 feet in front of him. The problem is that that'll kill lov light vision, so he can't see anything except that small patch. It's probably best to find a light with a third (or less) of the light and learn to ride with it. That way he can bicycle where there are other people. Save the spotlight for the countryside.
pdlamb is offline