Thread: Polar vortex
View Single Post
Old 11-10-14, 03:42 PM
  #113  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7353 Post(s)
Liked 2,481 Times in 1,440 Posts
Scientific theories cannot be proven but can be disproven. If you don't understand this, your education is incomplete. Read about the scientific process. It's true that skepticism is useful. It's true that scientists have been wrong. There is no such thing as settled science. In fact, it is a contradiction in terms. The peer review system is not perfect, but it beats all other ways of advancing knowledge. I suggest you learn about it. Scientists argue all the time, but that doesn't mean they are categorically full of bunk.

If you are looking for rationally derived knowledge, you look to science. If you eschew the generally accepted views because they are generally accepted, you are acting anti-rationalist.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline