Thread: Klein ????
View Single Post
Old 11-10-14 | 05:15 PM
  #69  
embankmentlb's Avatar
embankmentlb
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 472
From: North, Ga.

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Originally Posted by DiabloScott
That carbon fiber rear end is something that was introduced with the first Waterloo-built bikes. I think Trek was looking for something to make aluminum bikes justify a higher price tag, and maybe it was a faster construction time, and maybe it was just a gimmick, and maybe there were too many people whining about stiffness. It also corresponded to the change in naming from Quantum to Q... so sometimes when people say they have a Q-Pro, I have to verify... is that actually Quantum Pro? (Chehalis, aluminum rear end) or did you truly mean Q-Pro? (Waterloo, carbon rear end).



One of the things that made Kleins a little different was that they used 6000 series aluminum alloys, and then heat treated the whole frame which gave very strong joints. Cheaper aluminum bikes typically use 7000 series aluminums that can handle hotter, sloppier welding without heat treating afterwards... same idea with Scandium.
The carbon rear is probably a gimmick of sorts as are most things in the bike industry. Gimmick or not, I have put a ton of miles on these bikes and I love the way they ride!
I have read that the process of constructing the AL/carbon Klien frames was very problematic with a third of the first run of frames being rejected.
I guess there is some intangible perception of quality with the bikes made in Gary’s factory. Gary certainly did have some outstanding painters under his roof. Having owned both new and old Kleins over the years and don’t see a real quality difference with the factory move.
embankmentlb is offline  
Reply