View Single Post
Old 11-11-14 | 10:26 AM
  #68  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,193
Likes: 6,423
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by Coal Buster
The problem I had with the 5-speed was that when I priced them out it was only about $20 cheaper than the 8-speed. I know it's a different animal than the eight but still. I'd rather have the extra three speeds.
What are the tradeoffs? Off the top of my head:

- 8-speed has smaller steps
- 8-speed has wider range
- 5-speed is likely to be more reliable and durable

If the difference is $20, I would definitely get the 8-speed.

Those forthcoming 5-speed models look great. I suspect I would set it up with 3rd gear as a 60-inch gear, so I would have 38, 48, 60, 75, and 94 inch gears.

Sturmey Archer seems to get bike-geekier every year. I love it.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply