View Single Post
Old 11-14-14 | 04:49 PM
  #62  
photogravity's Avatar
photogravity
Hopelessly addicted...
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 13
From: Central Maryland

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

Originally Posted by lostarchitect
+1, and USPS is actually a pretty sound business. The whole "unprofitable" USPS situation was politically created by those who want to kill it off. It was mandated that the USPS had to fund pensions 75 years in advance--more than any private business and any other government agency. They are paying pensions for people who are not employees yet. It's nuts. It adds up to billions of dollars a year in losses.
Yep, that's one of those things that nobody talks about. The whole situation makes me so mad I could spit nails. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is the bailout mechanism for these big corporations that go bankrupt and we, as taxpayers, pay for that. Nobody thinks about that or even says anything about it, yet the USPS has to fund pensions 75 years out. It is fine for a multi-billion corporation to have an underfunded pension, yet the USPS is forced to overfund their pension system.

Full disclosure here: I an NOT a USPS employee, though I am a proud civil servant who works for a non-defense agency in the federal government.
photogravity is offline  
Reply