View Single Post
Old 11-21-14 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
Carbonfiberboy
just another gosling
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 2,644
From: Everett, WA

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Originally Posted by DaveLeeNC
I wonder if there are any real studies that investigate this? This concept (which is not illogical) is common 'out there in amateur cycling land'. But so is the idea of "do not waste your time with junk miles".

Anyone aware of such a study(s)? It would seem very relevant to me.

Thanks.

dave
The concept of "junk miles" is that too many cyclists spend too much time in zone 3, in between truly hard and truly moderate or easy. This tires the cyclist while providing neither the fat-burning advantage of easier rides nor the stimulation of harder rides. Hence the admonition that too many cyclists ride neither easy enough nor hard enough. I have Mr. Chapple's book. What he is preaching is far from the concept of "junk miles."

Mr. Chapple has studied it in his coaching practice as have many other coaches. I don't know of a long-term double blind study, but that sort of study is ill-suited to the complex issues involved in season-long periodized training. My practice has been to try out various theories on myself and see what they do for me. I've learned one thing for sure, and that is that lots of base miles are a huge help after the second hard pass of the day. The more the better. However I haven't had the discipline or sufficient interest in self-denial to stick with Mr. Chapple's program. The joy of whomping on someone who usually whomps on me always gets the better of me.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Reply