Old 11-22-14, 07:09 PM
  #51  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,726

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,592 Times in 1,436 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
Corrected as shown. There is a move toward 35.0 mm also but it hasn't gone mainstream yet, if ever.
Thanks, I edited out the typo. At some point things get ridiculous. There will always be outboard flex, so the benefits of a thicker bulge at the clamp is going to be minimal. If greater rigidity is desired the better approach would be to either add more material, or extend the bulge as was SOP for aluminum bars, or both. A fatter short area at the clamp is more about marketing than technology.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline