And why?

I need to downsize in a big way because of an impending move to a much, much more expensive locale (read much smaller living accommodations). These three bikes all fit and all do essentially the same thing, more or less, so I need to reduce it to one. The plan/hope is to use one of these as a commuter/tourer/gravel grinder. Which would you keep?

1) 1983 Schwinn Voyageur SP - I just recently finished a rebuild on this one to make it something I'd ride more often. I just wasn't a fan of the half step + granny setup. It now has an Ultegra 6503 crankset, 6503 FD, 7900 DT shifters, 36 spoke Mavic MA2 wheels, 11-34 10 speed cassette, and XT long cage rear derailleur. Pretty sweet setup in my opinion. I still have all the original components as well. I had built a dynamo hub into the original front wheel.

2) 2010 Civia Bryant - This thing is super versatile. It can take disc or caliper brakes, has good clearance, tons of braze-ons for just about anything you'd want, split dropout if you want a belt drive, etc. I built it with a 6600 double group, Avid BB7 disc brakes, Thomson stem, Nitto post, 650b wheelset (Velocity Blunt to XT hubs).

3) 2009 Raleigh Sojourn - This was cobbled together on the super cheap and has been my grocery bike for a while. There's a gnarly dent in the top tube but it has no effect on anything. I use it for grocery runs and the like because I figure the dent makes it less attractive. The build is FSA compact carbon cranks, Deore long cage RD, 105 FD, Avid BB7 brakes, 105 9 speed shifters, Bontrager (cheap) 29er wheels. This can go 650b, which I've done, or fat tires on 700c. I was able to fit 45's or so in the past, but currently has 28s. It's a touring bike so it also has all the braze-ons, like the other two. And it rides like buttah.

So, those are your choices.