View Single Post
Old 12-04-14, 02:06 PM
  #11  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5787 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,430 Posts
I hate to throw gasoline on the fire, but there are also differences in clamp design and quality. Some systems are more prone to slippage, or have less micro-adjust capability. Others clamp in a way that damage saddle rails, especially lighter tubular on non-steel rails.

There are also differences in failure modes. For example some posts are designed to bend at loads lower than where they'd snap, while others will snap before they bend. Likewise with clamps where some may lose control of the tilt while still keeping the saddle in place, while others can lose the saddle entirely. While nobody wants a failure, or even to think about them, good design factors the risks and provides for better failure modes if possible.

So while weight and cosmetics may drive the process at the higher end, failsafe engineering may be the difference between lower and mid-range posts.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline