Originally Posted by
wphamilton
It's not that - I just felt it to be a trivial question posed in order to irritate me. The relative incidents of types accidents have been looked into and aren't really controversial.
It seems to me that you post provocative/controversial "understandings" but do not want any response but a high five confirmation. You are hardly alone in that preference, BF has lots of posters who cannot handle skepticism of flaky claims or opposing opinions of their views, especially if it is not IAW current
Bicycling Correctness™ views held by BF mavens.