Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
What makes you think the serious head injuries are not occuring with high frequency as a result of hit from behind collisions?
Do you still maintain that your understanding is not controversial?
Even the LAB report refers to my understanding as the generally accepted one, so no it's not controversial.
As for the first, you support my point. If that were the case, then the effectiveness of helmets cannot be ruled out because the victim dies anyway, as Six Jours suggests.