Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
I can't recall my posting a word about helmets in this current series of posts about your "understanding" of the frequency/seriousness of hit from behind accidents.
That made no sense to me at all, sorry. "
Do you seriously accept that it proves that helmets are useless in all high-speed car-bike interactions, that a couple of hundred of them were hit-from-behind fatalities? "
What does that have to do with "my understanding" (which incidentally I proved is neither controversial nor different from the literature, rendering moot whatever point you're trying to make)