Originally Posted by CarinusMalmari

And what do you know, the moment you start using helmeteer logic against helmeteers, they start pulling "facts" out of their arse to keep their challenged belief-system intact. "Facts" like "It's always hot humid weather"; which is apparently extremely dangerous for anyone wearing a full face motor cycle helmet on a bicycle.


Motor cycle helmets are safer. Heck even full-face bicycle helmets are better. The problem is that cyclists aren't going to buy those because they're more interested in things like comfort and weight, so Bell sells what people want, not necessarily what they need. They're in the business of selling things to you, not some form of charity.


And yet you're here, arguing with me. Other than that, you're not here to promote the libertarian POV, you're here to shame people who don't conform to your standards.



The fact that you seem to think that cycling is very risky and border-line suicidal when done without a helmet, (Darwin Award worthy, am I right?) is probably an indication that you take way too much risks; Most probably because you're simply an incompetent cyclists, you wouldn't be the first helmet-monger whose clueless in that respect. It's might be a good idea to take a primer course on the subject, so you can familiarize yourself with the basics of cycling safety.