Originally Posted by 350htrr

I have a problem with that 1% in the sense that it's correct for injuries that required a hospital visit where the helmet failed to protect enough... But what about all those other crashes that people walked away with no injuries or slight injuries because they were wearing a helmet and it saved them enough to not require a hospital visit, nobody knows those numbers but I suspect the potential is a lot higher than 1% chance of an incident with injuries requiring a hospital visit, if all those numbers were known, the incident level for possible injuries would rise, and if nobody wore a helmet because it's only a 1% chance... that number may skyrocket to 2%... 3%...4%...5%+...? JMO