Originally Posted by
531Aussie
So, what do we think is the main reason this guy improved? The increased volume? The 'rest' he got from cutting almost all of the z5 intervals? The increase of z4 work? Or a bit of all of the above?
Interesting question. Something missing from a lot of these study summaries is a measure of the quality of the high intensity work. My experience has been this goes up because you are fully recovered.
I think a big limiter for cycling is the burden put on a few muscle groups to get the necessary aerobic work in for the whole body (vs say XC Skiing). Getting in the volume w/o breaking down your legs is a real balancing act & I think polarizing gives you more margin for error.
Guess I'm saying I think both, don't think they can be separated.