Old 01-10-15 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
SpeedyStein's Avatar
SpeedyStein
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: 2017 Giant Trance 2, 2016 SOMA Wolverine, 2015 Diamondback Haanjo Comp

Originally Posted by jimc101
If you are looking at an early 90's Cannondale, this could severely limit you fork choice, if a frame originally designed for headshok, unless appropriate adapters are used.
Even if it didn't have a headshok, it would be tricky with an early 90's Cannondale, cause most of them had 1 1/4" forks, not 1 1/8". I had a M2000 with the rigid Pepperoni fork, which was a great bike, but expensive to change the fork or stem since they are non-standard size.

BTW, that bike was a great bomb-proof commuter in factory spec. Light, tough wheels, XT drivetrain, Ritchey and Easton cockpit. It was probably in the realm of 25-26lbs with slick tires. I seriously doubt you are going to find ANY 90's MTB much lighter than that, rigid or suspension fork.

Last edited by SpeedyStein; 01-10-15 at 01:25 PM.
SpeedyStein is offline  
Reply