Old 02-11-15, 11:43 PM
  #28  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,535

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathpack
Im not sure what @ESTrainSmart will say, but my fitter determined this with a FitBike. He can adjust crank length and have me pedal various crank lengths and simultaneously measure power output. I do have a demonstably better power output on 165mm cranks vs 170mm cranks. I never asked what the power difference was, but I got the impression that it was not huge. But I just like the feel of the 165 mm cranks, so that's what I went with. When I got bike #2 , it had 170mm cranks already and I was going to keep them, my fitter says they're fine for me, just not optimal. That lasted all of about 2 weeks. I really just strongly prefer the 165s.
I'll look around. There must be a similarly equipped bike shop somewhere around here. While I don't feel any difference in power or comfort between 170s and 175s, I do like 170s better because I pedal a slower preferred cadence on the 175s and I'm used to the higher cadence. It would be interesting to see, though.
Carbonfiberboy is offline