Thread: Pump or CO2?
View Single Post
Old 02-18-15 | 12:38 PM
  #76  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
rpenmanparker
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Originally Posted by wphamilton
I don't know about a comprehensive footprint analysis, but my understanding is that the CO2 for cartridges is captured as a byproduct of industrial combustions and sometimes organic processes. ie, it would otherwise be released into the atmosphere, so the net effect is nothing.

I do recall repairing a flat one night, in freezing rain. It's hard to imagine someone begrudging me the time saved as laziness, not that you'd particularly care in that situation. I've used maybe three of them in the last 5 years so I'd say that it's only a small amount of laziness. Considering that I have probably expended more energy carrying them around (5500 - 7300 miles per year @roadwarrior) than I have saved by not pumping by hand on the couple of flats.
In fairness to the eco-nerds you are not counting the mechanical energy to manufacture the steel cartridge, the energy to compress the CO2 and fill the cartridge, the eco effects of manufacturing and disposing of the packaging, the transportation fuel usage, etc., etc., etc. But I still discount all that stuff as negligible compared to our lifestyle in general of which I am quite fond.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply