View Single Post
Old 02-27-15 | 10:50 AM
  #37  
bradtx
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 6
From: Pearland, Texas

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Originally Posted by staehpj1
I agree with most of that, but not the part about looking at the savings "as a percent of the bike wgt + gear and body weight". I look at it this way there are scores of little decisions that all add up. Applying that metric, the majority of the choices I made in reducing my total bike/gear/person weight were insignificant and yet those ounces here and there were a big part of what in total was a dramatic reduction. I advise looking at every item and weight choice as important and making each decision with that mindset even where it is a matter of ounces or even tenths of ounces.
Ultimately all of the decisions WRT weight sums up as bike + rider + cargo.

The OP isn't going to save a great amount of weight with just a lighter fork and if I were on a campaign to reduce the bicycle's weight, that would be only one of many items. I do like to upgrade broken or damaged bits when possible, which maybe the case in this thread. However, with so little real world data available about using a CF trekking/touring fork I don't know if the OP is actually upgrading, other than the weight reduction, but it is an interesting option.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Reply