View Single Post
Old 03-10-15, 06:51 AM
  #17  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7353 Post(s)
Liked 2,480 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Why would this desire rule out carbon?

It may be less crash resistant than metal but in terms of fatigue resistance -- crabon beats any metal frame. I personally switched to carbon because I got sick of wearing out metal frames.

I should also note that carbon is the most repairable frame material and crash resistant crabon frames are available:

http://calfeedesign.com/products/luna/
Fatigue? Wearing out frames? What planet are you on? I think I know what metal fatigue. I haven't seen any metal bike frames die of fatigue, at least not steel.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is online now