View Single Post
Old 03-10-15, 12:48 PM
  #27  
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by RoderWrench
IMO if you want a commuter frame to last 20 years, crash resistance should be a high priority. The bike is likely to get banged around some in that much time. If it were me, I would look at Ti built to a touring spec, something similar to a Lynskey Backroad.
I broke my carbon frame (crash) 6 years ago. Calfee repaired it for $300 without voiding the lifetime warranty. I've also personally patched up the surface coat of my carbon frames with nail polish and some fine grit paper over a dozen times. The idea that carbon is not ready to be commuted on is utter nonsense.

That's MTB riding!
Nah. That's a metal frame with inherently flawed bottom bracket design. I will never total a carbon frame by cracking the bottom bracket via use. For me, carbon is inherently more fatigue and wear resistant.

YMMV.
spare_wheel is offline