Originally Posted by
FastJake
But what's the benefit? I see a marginal increase in weight and a marginal (potential) increase in spoke breakage at the nipple. So why do it at all?
BITD, when LF flanges were common on road hubs, and we built with lighter spokes, 4x 36h was common to reduce torsional load on rear wheels, especially for alpine riding. I still build 36h LF track wheels 4x for sprinter clients. Otherwise 3x,4x barely makes a difference either way, especially with SF hubs where the difference is marginal.
There's also a practical advantage to the builder in building 36h 4x. It allows use of the same spokes regardless of flange size, reducing inventory needs.