Thread: 3X or 2X ?
View Single Post
Old 04-01-15 | 02:34 PM
  #19  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by FastJake
But what's the benefit? I see a marginal increase in weight and a marginal (potential) increase in spoke breakage at the nipple. So why do it at all?
BITD, when LF flanges were common on road hubs, and we built with lighter spokes, 4x 36h was common to reduce torsional load on rear wheels, especially for alpine riding. I still build 36h LF track wheels 4x for sprinter clients. Otherwise 3x,4x barely makes a difference either way, especially with SF hubs where the difference is marginal.

There's also a practical advantage to the builder in building 36h 4x. It allows use of the same spokes regardless of flange size, reducing inventory needs.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply