Old 04-06-15, 01:26 PM
  #22  
B1KE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
ITT: a bunch of people commenting on $6000 bikes who have never ridden $6000 bikes.

OP: it's about optimization and design effort. It takes a lot more engineering effort to design a sub-15lb bike than it does a 17+lb bike (and the price reflects this as much as it does the raw material cost - $4000 buys about a week of one engineer's time; development cycles are in the years of man-hours). Two pounds might not seem like a lot, but 2lbs is 1% of a 200lb bike+rider system, which is directly 1% faster up a hill, which is 6 seconds on a 10 minute hill. Races have been won on far less margin.

If none of this seems important to you, then you are not in the market for a $6000 bike. Not everyone is.
Thanks for you reply, that makes sense. Sounds like the higher up you go the differences are smaller but when it comes to racing those differences are enough to create a win or loss.
B1KE is offline