Old 11-04-05 | 10:11 PM
  #14  
spud's Avatar
spud
i am sure that i hate you
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 0
From: 703

Bikes: 'Cha-ruzu Fosuta Orusan Kein' Fuji Track (2005), Schwinn Tank MTB (?), Fuji Royale (1979)

Originally Posted by SyntaxPC
I think you are. While the number of teeth engaging the ring is constant during rotation, the chain tension is not constant. Sheldon and rykoala are just saying that the change in tension is negligible and therefore not a problem for fixed gear riding.

My question is the following: will a large (high 50s-tooth) biopace ring have a higher variance in tension than a small (low 40s-tooth) biopace ring?

I realize that both rings should be perfectly fine for fixed riding; I'm just wondering if there are any significant differences besides the number of teeth. For example, besides tension variance, would a large biopace ring theoretically provide a larger performance gain relative to a small biopace ring?
that depends on whether or not the ratio (long axis vs short axis) is constant on all biopace rings.
__________________
putting the pi back in pirate!
It’s an upstanding member of the solar system
Apply the laws of earth and make it a victim
Of Proposition 187
spud is offline  
Reply