Originally Posted by
Sunsanvil
I've read that excellent article many times. The relation between saddle fore/aft and TT/stem length is pretty clear. The question is, is there an infinite number of positions between full upright and full prone, or is there an area in between which is sort of a dead zone where you cannot get a balance?
I feel like the test that Peter White details really should give you an infinite number of positions. At least it does for me. The thing about having too upright of a position is that you will not involve as many muscles as you do with a position that's more prone.