View Single Post
Old 04-16-15 | 01:38 PM
  #19  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 2,167
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by cale
I don't think there's any superiority of a "slid back on the saddle" position, it's a "mix-up" position. Changing around which muscle groups are contributing to the effort allows a more balanced approach to climbing.
I would agree with that, but that's not what I was responding to nor what you called "good advice" earlier when he said:
Originally Posted by topflightpro
Typically, when climbing seated, sliding back on the saddle is more beneficial to sliding forward.
I still do not agree with that, though as I said, it may do as much with setup as biomechanics, but it's certainly not true for me, and I've spent plenty of hours just staring at power numbers to know it empirically. Furthermore, I've ridden hills steep enough that sliding back would fairly land you on your back; when the front has to stay weighted, you've got to shift your weight forward.
chaadster is offline  
Reply