Old 04-22-15, 04:10 PM
  #56  
GlennR
On Your Left
 
GlennR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times in 1,187 Posts
Originally Posted by cale
The QR system has been flawed for decades. Tabs on the fork ends were one solution to a glaring problem. Curved levers are another. Most of the time everyone wants everything to work out all right. The customers, the manufacturers, the lawyers even. But imagine a family outing with the the bikes. You and your spouse with the kids. The bikes get unloaded, the wheels need to be installed, a moment of distraction leads to the nut that should have been tightened left alone, the QR lever left open, a bike leaning against a car is rolled onto the path and a there a ride starts well but ends badly.

These ARE predictable moments but even when predictable, like fingers between spokes, they are inherent to the dangers of the sport. A stick can fly into spokes and cause death. It CAN happen but risks abound and most athletes, and even casual riders, manage the risks well.

It seems that this particular problem may have roots in some former litigation and Trek is acting in its best interests. And, no doubt, the interests of their customers.
But imagine a family outing in the minivan. On the way to the beach you get a flat. You pull over to a safe place and put on the spare. But a moment of distraction you forget to tighten all the lug bolts. You continue on your way but a few miles later you feel a shutter and then suddenly the wheel falls off.

Who's fault is it... the car manufacturer?

If you're not responsible enough to ensure your own safety, you should not remove the wheel. My wife is not so we have AAA and she'll call them to put on the spare.
GlennR is offline