Thread: Trek Recall
View Single Post
Old 04-22-15 | 07:25 PM
  #10  
jyl's Avatar
jyl
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Failing to properly close a quick release is certainly foreseeable. It is not an uncommon thing to happen. The user is expected to loosen and tighten that quick release as part of the normal operation of the bike, when fixing flats, using bike racks, etc so there are many opportunities to have a problem.

In the event that happens, the "lawyer lips" provide some protection against the failure mode of the axle falling out of the dropout.

But having a quick release that opens so far creates a different failure mode, of the lever getting trapped in the disc, and there is no mechanism to protect against that.

There is no reason to have so much lever travel, it doesn't have any benefit. So additional risk, a new failure mode, has been created, for no additional benefit. If the engineers didn't see this failure mode, that is sloppy. If they recognized it but didn't specify lever travel limits, that is sloppy. If they specified it, but whoever procured the quick release didn't follow the spec, that is sloppy.
jyl is offline  
Reply