View Single Post
Old 04-28-15 | 10:18 AM
  #12  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by on the path
I'm wondering if an electronic FD would minimize this result, if not eliminate it. If I understand correctly, an electronic FD doesn't use spring tension to move the chain toward the frame.
It'll help, not because of spring tension, but because the system is smart. When you're riding on the large ring and outer half of the cassette, the system makes a crisp downshift. But when you're riding on the middle or inner half of the cassette, it compensates for the chain angle by shifting slowly and hesitating a fraction of a second so the chain can't suddenly snap inward and overshoot.

But you might have misread my post. I wasn't referring to the FDs spring, but the issue of the chain's tension when under load. The electronic system may be better under these conditions, bt don't expect a miracle. The key is NOT TO DOWNSHIFT THE FRONT UNDER LOAD.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply