Old 05-11-15 | 12:55 PM
  #42  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,235
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Originally Posted by caloso
Watts are watts. Physiologically, an equivalent power output will be equivalently draining. And that's why power meters are useful training tools.

Psychologically though, it can vary.
Originally Posted by asgelle
It's hard for me to reconcile that with the understanding that muscle fiber recruitment depends on the speed and force of contraction and that different types fatigue at different rates.
I tend to favor the first position as a practical matter. I'm sure differences in cadence, and position in climbing versus riding on the flats do make some difference, but for practical purposes it still comes back to watts are pretty much watts whether its 300 watts up an 8% grade at 9mph, or 25mph on the flats.

In training in Florida, for mountainous races such as Everest Challenge, I've found that long intervals aimed at raising FTP, done on flat ground are pretty effective training for climbing, because its all about w/kg.

Admittedly training on the flats for climbing is not perfect, because there are some muscle recruitment issues, as well psychological issues, but it translates pretty well.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply