View Single Post
Old 05-13-15 | 11:37 AM
  #2  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Interestingly, the triple version of that crank calls for a NDS spacer between the cup and arm -- presumably to make sure the arm is still spaced out far enough to clear the chainstay: http://www.shimano.com/media/techdoc...9830616000.pdf So there is a precedent for scootching the things around with this system. But that document also says not to use the small ring with the three smallest cogs, so...

I'm not as familiar with the HT style cranks, so the only question I have is whether the inner cover thing would still connect properly with both BB cups if the DS cup is now 2-2.5mm further away.

Other things to consider: whether you need a 52T/53T big ring. If you substituted a 48T or 50T, there would be less potential for the chain to rub when in the small/smaller cog combinations, because the diameter of the big ring would be smaller.

If it were a friction-shifted front, I'd consider adding thin spacers between the small ring and crank arm in order to scootch the two rings apart, which would increase the chain angle on the small/smallest gear combos, but would reduce/prevent the rub. That might mess up the front shifting though.

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 05-13-15 at 11:40 AM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply