Old 05-15-15 | 11:04 AM
  #139  
genec's Avatar
genec
genec
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 27,072
Likes: 4,533
From: West Coast

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Originally Posted by njkayaker
You are the one doing the dancing.

Technically, it was an unsafe pass (based on the common standard of three feet) that fortunately did not have a bad consequence.

Excessive speeding is considered unsafe and it doesn't always have bad consequences. Driving drunk is considered unsafe and doesn't always have bad consequences.

That something doesn't have a bad consequence doesn't make it safe. Saying it does is just plain silly.

Your implication that we can only consider something as unsafe only when there are bad consequences is silly too.

Technically, there aren't always "bright line" differences between safe and unsafe. Technically, it's usually an issue of probabilty and risk.

.
There is no such common standard... if there were, states would not have to pass "3 foot laws."
genec is offline