View Single Post
Old 05-19-15 | 11:14 AM
  #1565  
grolby's Avatar
grolby
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,878
Likes: 160
From: BOSTON BABY
Originally Posted by Dutch Jazz
Correct me if I'm wrong here; but if you are saying that friction = power lost, doesn't that mean that 45x12 is better than 52x14, because the chain makes contact with fewer teeth. Fewer contact points = less friction = less power losses?
That's not how it works. It's been found repeatedly over the years that larger sprocket combinations yield slightly less resistance. It's not a lot - maybe a watt or two, best case - but there is a difference. From what I understand, it is because of the slightly reduced radius of the bend each link has to make as the chain wraps around the chainring in particular. This is also the reason that there have been some companies selling extra large aftermarket cages and jockey wheels for rear derailleurs, but the benefits are much more questionable for the part of the chain that is not under high tension.
grolby is offline  
Reply