View Single Post
Old 05-20-15, 05:44 PM
  #68  
WCroadie
Senior Member
 
WCroadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chester County, PA
Posts: 2,365

Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.5 CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by cthenn
Actually, the rule is pretty straight forward. There is no mis-interpretation going on. It's black and white.

2.3.012
All riders may render each other such minor services as lending or exchanging food, drink, spanners or accessories.
The lending or exchanging of tubular tyres or bicycles and waiting for a rider who has been dropped or involved in an accident shall be permitted only amongst riders of the same team. The pushing of one rider by another shall in all cases be forbidden, on pain of disqualification.


So...riders can give each other bidons, food, etc, and furthermore there is nothing in there about colluding within the boundaries of racing. Colluding happens all the time, as witnessed just recently by Aru and Contador while trying to drop Uran. Breakaways amongst different teams is collusion by definition. So, there is really no argument that Porte should not have gotten a penalty, it's as clear as day in the rules.
No one's arguing the rule is unclear, tho either Porte and Clarke didn't know the rule or they chose to disobey it. The rule is stupid and as others pointed out, the UCI has a lot of stupid rules that they sometimes enforce and sometimes don't. They should be consistent.
WCroadie is offline