View Single Post
Old 05-21-15 | 12:28 PM
  #25  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by auxym
Yeah, that's likely actually. I followed sheldon's recommendation to set it "tight as it can be without binding" but I might have gone a bit over the limit. Lesson learned.
I hope you've misread Sheldon's recommendation, because, if not it's plain wrong, and it may be part of the reason so many newer SS, IGH, and fixed gear riders are having so many problems.

The right advice is the same as it's been for a century. Chain drives (without tension idlers) must have a slack loop. That applies to ALL chain drive systems including bicycles, machinery and trucks. There doesn't need to be much slack, just enough slack to accommodate any eccentricity in the sprockets and ensue that the chain is never tight.

Chain drives have two loops, the power loop which is under the tension needed to transfer torque from one sprocket to the other, and the return loop whose sole purpose is to make the system endless. Tensioning the return loop (lower on a bicycle) only serves to increase the loads on all the components, and cause premature wear or failure. Here's a link to images of chain drive trucks. Note the visible sag in the lower loops.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply