View Single Post
Old 05-28-15 | 09:27 AM
  #29  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,641
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Originally Posted by crank_addict
^ To be fair, my concerns are with a tandem and limited selection for 27" application. Gumwall for style points. I mentioned some of the problems in another thread so won't repeat too much here. The longevity issue is not talked much by test / journalist for heavy weight usage and sidewall flare out. Those bulging sidewalls are getting an extra workout.

So the typical answer by most is to further inflate, in this case, over the spec rating.

Add the problem of an overinflated clincher on a hot ambient day, brakes that work extra hard, creating more heat and to the tire. I find it difficult to believe this type of situation is going to be easy on such tire. Those sidewalls have a shred or burst point but even if they hold, it can't help in longevity. Its like driving your car with over inflated tires trying to compromise for a large load. That tire is going to run hotter and wear out quicker.
Actually, tires run hotter when underinflated wrt load because of the extra sidewall flex. Overinflating (within prudent limits) reduces the heat problem, and using larger tires is the best solution because the load-carrying capacity goes up. I run 38mm tires on my rando/touring/commuting bike, and they have an easy life because I weigh about 155 lbs and never put a lot of extra weight on the bike.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply