View Single Post
Old 06-02-15 | 10:42 AM
  #93  
rekmeyata's Avatar
rekmeyata
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by Gnosis
Then you should carry such a device, as it makes you “feel” safer.

I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device. In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless.

Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices?

Answer: They rode cautiously, they enjoyed themselves, and they were prepared to accept whatever consequences.

I’m of that same making, from the same generation of people that grew up without such devices and you know what; I liked those days much better than these current times of being hounded to death by cell phone calls, e-mails, texts, pager alerts, telemarketers, surveyors, etc… For me, silence is golden.

Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones.

I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown.
I AGREE WITH YOU 100% IN ALL THAT YOU SAID!!! Screw what the others think about what you said which is so truthful they can't stand it so they have to rage against you.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply