Old 06-08-15 | 09:30 AM
  #39  
linberl's Avatar
linberl
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,538
Likes: 451
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Now: HPV Gecko FX 20 w/ assist.. Old: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist

Originally Posted by Stucky
I decided long ago, not to be a slave to insurance companies. I'm not car-free, so I have to carry liability insurance, but having to carry that insurance (as well as having to have a license and registration, etc.) has always made me wish it were possible to be car-free where I now live.

I recently dropped my home-owner's coverage, when they substantially raised the premium (Even though I've never once had a claim; and carried a very high deductible) [It seems everyone got a substantial raise after Hurrican Sandy; even those of us who live in places not affected by the hurricane!]- I've paid tens of thousands of dollars in insurance premiums over the years (Between homeonwer's and auto) and never had one claim, nor ever had to have an insurance company pay-out a dime on my behalf. I would much rather have saved/invested that money, and been self-insured.

So that's what I do now, with home-owner's. And what I've always done with health[and that POS in the WH can go to Hell; I'm not participating in his Marxist system!]...and if I were to ever become car-free again, I'd drop the auto insurance in a heartbeat, and deal with any future consequences when and if they arose. I would not be held hostage by threats of future gouging if i dropped coverage that I no longer needed. Even if it cost a little more at first if you were to ever re-insure, what you save in the meantime would more than make-up for it; and not only that, but I'd bet even if the premiums were a little higher at first, they would return to normal after a few months or a year of having the new coverage.

I make it a point to give as little of my money as possible to insurance companies. I haver to carry basic liability on my vehicles; The only "elective" coverage I have, is higher limits on that liability (It costs practically nothing to increase the coverage from the legal minimum to $300K- which is a good investment, as the minimum won't do much for you, should you ever need it; and I carry comp and collision on one of my vehicles, only because an extra $300 a year seems well worth it to protect a vehicle which has a fair-market value of $10K.

The average person, between auto; home-owners; health; life; etc. insurance, will spend several hundred-thousand dollars in their lifetime on insurance. After taxes, insurance is most people's biggest expense [More so than housing- because at least with a house, you still retain the value of what you pay for it; with insurance, if you don't have a major catastrophe, you'll never see a dime of that money again]

Heck, one of the advantages of going car-free, is to be free of the obligations that car ownership entails. Being free of mandatory insurance, is one of those principle advantages.
Self-insuring is a wonderful idea but, unless you are extremely wealthy, not practical. One seriously debilitating illness, accident, or natural disaster, and you end up taking from other taxpayers. And, as we all know, past performance is not predictive of the future, so those last 20 years without claims mean nothing. Going car-free involves doing a positive thing for yourself and society; going insurance free does not imo.
linberl is offline  
Reply