View Single Post
Old 06-13-15 | 10:06 AM
  #20  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota

Bikes: N+1=5

Originally Posted by noglider
It's a bad idea. I use a Take-A-Look mirror attached to my glasses. It's a very good mirror.
This is the answer. Another good solution is the Bike Eye mirror that mounts to your frame. Fairly discrete and a way better mirror than most.

Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
In low light it's even worse. Cameras do worse in low light than the human eye does, and the LCD screen will ruin your night vision.

I don't think that a camera would be a better solution than a mirror even if the camera was free.
at night, the mirror works even better. Car lights make it much easier to identify an approaching car.

The thing I find with mirrors and that I think would be an even bigger problem with a camera/lcd approach is the distance vision. Riding on rural roads or highways, you need to know when a car is approaching way back. A fairly long distance away, you can easily hear the tire noise on the pavement. With a mirror either on your bike or body, you can adjust your body position to get a wider view. If the mirror is not one of those damned convex mirrors, you'll have a very good ability to see what's out in the distance. An LCD is not going to do that well and is going to be better with a wider angle view.

There was a (Danish?) company that was making a device that was a combination tail light and proximity detector. As a car approached, the tail light got more noticeable and the bar mount display indicated relative position. I believe Garmin bought them and I expect we'll see that pop up in their bike computer line in a year or two.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Reply