Originally Posted by
mr_bill
I insisted on nothing. Just pointed out the platitude you've used before to dodge the question.
I seriously doubt that. Or this:
Originally Posted by
mr_bill
And yet less than a year ago, it was a "fair question."
I had thought that you might be interested in the differing risk ratios and catastrophic consequences which show that your analogy is improper, but since you prefer this vaguely insulting mis-recollection instead, I'll go back to non-conversational mode with you now.