View Single Post
Old 06-18-15 | 02:31 PM
  #18  
54roadie
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Chicago

Bikes: 2012 Giant Defy Composite, 1989 Paramount OS, 50th Anniversary Paramount Track, 1986 Paramount Road, 1981 Superior, late eighties Kestrel MX-Z, 1974 Viscount Aerospace, circa 1972 Gitane Tour de France, 2011 Dahon folder

Originally Posted by HillRider
It's funny that Octalink bottom brackets are accused of poor durability when my experience says they last extremely well. I wonder if people are lumping Octalink with ISIS since they share some design similarities. There were indeed some very poor, low quality ISIS bottom brackets but Octalinks weren't among them.

Durability isn't the issue. Any decent quality BB should effectively last forever. By which I mean the spindle and cups; replace the balls and rollers as needed. The neoprene seals are full contact, which significantly improves cleanliness, at some sacrifice to friction. My issues are 1) the tiny, and loose, ball and needle bearings that fall out of their "retainers" causing no end of grief, 2) the difficulty of adjusting the assembly to a correct preload after cleaning and re-installing (a direct result of those little ball bearings), and 3) the lack of good working diagrams showing the separate sleeve, and correct position and alignment of each part. Doesn't take much to fix all that.
54roadie is offline  
Reply