Originally Posted by
quicktrigger
I have no desire to argue, but I will point out that all the "major brands" put a similar disclaimer on their spec sheets. Some even try to use shifting specs as an excuse not to give you real weights of their bikes, a while trying to claim you need to spend lots more for a "lighter" bike they won't even tell you what it weights.
As for BD, many many of "their" bikes (excluding the Kestrel's, Fuji's etc) are actually the same starting frame. From there, "models" get different components, colors, etc. IMHO, they cut allot of costs by simply using 1-3 frames over and over again. Probable an OEM frame(s) from Kenesis. They do over sale allot, but if you are wanting a Ti bike, or Di2 bike, fat bike, and some of the lower end bikes, then you aren't likely to beat them on $$$. The quality of my mountain bike from BD has been as good as any in the general price range.
QT
I totally agree.
For $300 (I think they go for $359 now) I was very satisfied with my former BD bike. I was amazed at the quality for the price; Department-store price...but lower-end entry-level road bike quality. And I've always lusted after their TI bikes! I wasn't knocking them in my previous post- just describing the reality of such business models. Even today, I would feel no shame in riding one of their bikes- and wouldn't be surprised if I bought one from them again at some point in the future. They do offer many good deals for anyone- and especially for newcomers to the sport who are looking for a cheap first bike.