View Single Post
Old 07-02-15, 02:47 PM
  #15  
Ronno6
Senior Member
 
Ronno6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Deep South
Posts: 1,348

Bikes: Cannondale SR's and ST's from the '80's

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 46 Times in 20 Posts
As a reasonably tall (6'6" w/36" inseam) person for much of my adult life, finding a frame that fit using the traditional
2" to crotch standover clearance was next to impossible.
I did ride a 27" frame Fuji Royale in the early 80's and the fit was good.
However, the frame was a bit noodly when out of the saddle.
I transitioned to 63cm Cannondale SR frames in '86. This required a 300mm seat post and 130mm stem.
For the most part, that is what I have ridden ever since.
I do have a 66cm 'Dale CAD3, and do like it. But it is awaiting powder coating at the moment.
As for stem length, I find that a 10mm shorter stem is a help in the early season, til my upper body
becomes accustomed to the riding position. Then I go back to the 130mm to stretch out.
However.....................I seldom ride the drops; as I am fairly aero on the hoods.
Now, if I can get rid of some tummy, maybe the drops would be doable...........

I do have several 27" frame Cannondale touring bikes. Perfect for that activity.
I even have one with skinny tires and 2X10 drivetrain for real early in the season.
Ronno6 is offline