View Single Post
Old 07-07-15 | 08:23 AM
  #29  
corrado33
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 1
From: Bozeman

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Originally Posted by spare_wheel
Isn't wanting an IGH and a "ride fast" commuter a bit of a contradiction. I could see a 2-3 speed hub being a "ride fast" commuter but IGHs have significant efficiency and weight penalties and are not designed for mashing.
According to wikipedia (which references Bicycle Science), IGHs are only a few % to 10% less efficient than a derailleur depending on the condition of the components of derailleur system, what cog you're using, and whether or not you're cross chaining. I think that's acceptable considering the reliability and convenience of the IGH. Besides, my commuting bike rarely takes rides over 8 miles.

When I say "go fast" I don't mean I'm racing to work, I just don't want to be stuck on a bike meant to go ~10 mph when I want to go around 15-20 mph depending on terrain and wind.
corrado33 is offline  
Reply