View Single Post
Old 07-07-15 | 12:23 PM
  #55  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,171
Likes: 6,398
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by kickstart
All have advantages and disadvtages, the trick is finding ones best match.
Yes, of course.

All we had were rims brakes for the longest time. Now some claim that they absolutely need disc (or drum) brakes. (OK, drum brakes existed for a while but were not widely used.) I do accept that the presence of something sometimes creates its own need, but the differences between rim brakes and hub brakes isn't as dramatic as some seem to think. I don't ride any hub brakes, and I do just fine. When it's wet out, I allow greater stopping distances. If I believed my brakes were so fantastic that I didn't need to change anything, I'd be delusional, because while the brake might slow my wheel as well when wet as when dry, my tires don't.

I don't have anything against anyone using hub brakes. Really. But if someone were to imply that rim brakes are entirely unsuitable for his purpose, I'd need to see a very special purpose for me to believe him. There are a few, but most of us do just fine with rim brakes. And rims brakes are practically free. I have a bin of them in my barn, too many for me ever to need.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply