View Single Post
Old 07-14-15 | 09:23 AM
  #5  
bikemig's Avatar
bikemig
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 21,786
Likes: 5,709
From: Middle Earth (aka IA)

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

While I agree that triples made more sense when there were fewer gears on the back, triples still make sense in some situations. Loaded touring is one situation. Also age matters (i.e., you may need lower gears once you get older) and that might dictate a choice. If you do a lot of climbing, a triple might still be a good choice. One "problem" with triples is that they are becoming increasingly difficult to mesh with modern gearing systems so it is just easier to go with a double.

Even when I was fit and racing, I liked a triple when riding grades of 20%. Another potential advantage of triples is that you don't have as much of a jump when going from the big to the small ring up front. I'm not totally in love with what a 16 tooth jump does in terms of your gearing; YMMV.
bikemig is offline  
Reply