Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
In addition, my contention is that there are few (if any) significant "statistical facts" or any other credible evidence that the alleged "increased risk" to cyclists from cell phone use justifies the hysterical ranting that appears almost daily on this topic on numerous threads on BF, as well as other sources of media blathering/pontificating.
Are "statistical facts" different from plain old non-statistical facts? As usual, you apparently can't see or deduce the obvious.