Thread: Stack and Reach
View Single Post
Old 07-20-15 | 09:51 AM
  #20  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by MKahrl
I concur with most of what chaadster said but differ in that traditional sizing on traditional bikes was not as bad as described. When fitted at a bike shop or by anyone knowledgeable the equal seat and top tube frame dimensions got the majority of riders in the right zone. Adjustments to seatpost height, saddle setback, and moving the stem up and down got them there. Sometimes the stem length needed to be changed and that was a pain.

Keep in mind that bike buyers of the 1950's - 1980's were interested all-purpose 10-speeds with handlebars roughly level with the saddle. With the specialization of road bicycles to racing-style fit (low handlebars) and sloping top tubes it became much trickier to figure out where the critical contact points were. Not helped by buying bikes online without any sort of fitting.
Yes, I agree...and thought that's what I was expressing when I said traditional frame sizing worked for a variety of reasons, but I do appreciate the clarity of your simplified comment, specifically that it got riders in the right zone. Absolutely.
chaadster is offline  
Reply